The advantages of open innovation include relevance maintenance and speed of growth for many know that it means open innovation which is leveraging external sources of knowledge. Globalization entails the penetration of foreign markets through various means such as exportation or opening of foreign subsidiaries. Unfortunately, however, these steps are often taken without taking into consideration the adverse effects a company may have as it expands into foreign territories. On the other hand, a nation-state provides opportunities for innovation but these opportunities may not be fully beneficial when corporations manipulate those opportunities at the expense of the greater market.
The Benefits of Open Innovation and Local Ecosystems
As the business landscape and the economy evolve with people with them forward-thinking entities are utilizing open innovation at the forefront. Here’s why integrating open innovation with local ecosystems is a game changer for businesses:
- Employee willingness and ability to engage in external work or integration through which ideas, products, processes may be collectively put into operation by a network of organizations in the region. Open innovation is a practice that gives companies an edge. Engaging with local ecosystems helps establish links with incubators, accelerators, and even the state, thus enhancing the pace of innovation with diverse approaches.
- Agility and Speed to Market. Higher performance markets tend to be multiple partnered and collaborating with external partners brings the speed and ability to whittle the product to market. This adaptability enables them to be relevant in sectors where time to market is critical. Dependence on local partnerships, however, can also eliminate bureaucratic stifles and allow for quick policy frustrations to the need in the market.
- Cost Efficient Building everything from scratch is difficult and may be impossible due to the incurred costs. Companies will do so by entering the market with open poaching of innovation, which will allow them to offset development costs with their local counterpart. This is in turn able to save on operational cost of the companies especially for small and large corporations that are located at local ecosystems.
- Boosting Regional Economic. Growth Volumes of work back to the region and engaging in local ecosystem supports the company and the economy. Every company where work places are created is also a contributor to growth and economic development which encourages a more fierce fight for the survival of the advancements to come. An example of this, a syilicon valley where the corporate able and flourishing local systems become centers for advancing innovation would cut both corporations and civism.
- Risk Sharing Through Broadening The Scope Of Partners. Having external partners helps to mitigate the risks accompanying R&D activities. New concepts can be prototyped by the companies without taking the complete burden of failure. Local players, such as universities or start-ups, are also often willing to bear the risk which further enhances the level of innovation in the ecosystem.
- Enhancing The Society And The Image Of The Brand Equal benefits of open innovation can be derived by reinforcing a corporation’s link with the society and generating positive feeling towards the organization. When big business players put their money where their mouth is and engage in practices that develop the local environment, they make themselves look good in as far as social responsibility is concerned.
The Ethical Problem: Misuse of Government Funds
Despite the fact that open innovation and local ecosystems possess quite a few advantages, they can be used for unethical corporate practices. For example, corporations may penetrate foreign markets characterized by government grants and incentives only to ignore the operations once the incentives have been exploited. Such companies may be able to back their operations through an outsourcing ecosystem without damaging to the European Union funds but transferring their processes to their home country. Even though this form of behavior is legal more or less, it poses ethical issues.
Abuse of Government Subsidies
The governments of countries in the EU as well as the EU itself are known to give out tax funds, budgetary funds to develop the local economy, enhance certain regions of the country and create jobs. But, when a company subsidizes, for instance, to keep its customers and later closes its foreign factory, it defeats the purpose of long-term economic development. The impression left is that the business was in the objective of making profits within a short while leaving the people affected.
Legal Vs Ethical Approach
Though some of these actions particularly are legal and are not necessarily treasonable, it is evident to violate the purpose of any state aid followed by EU competition regulations. These corporate schemes highlight weaknesses in current legislation also where businesses establish a mesh of arrangements that allow them to access all the European Union programs indirectly and thus remain active. This poses major ethical challenges because regional and national funds that are expected to promote equalities within societies are instead used for countries’ profit making enterprises -and. This is at the expense of already suffering populations.
Assessing Corporate Misconduct In Terms Of Its Human And Economic Aspects
The situation becomes even more aggravated when organizations vanish and especially when they do so after appearing to have enjoyed such privations as the allotted government grants. Workers are left unemployed, businesses cease to be active and the populations that have been assured of substantial development are left penalties. In the meantime, the home country of the firm may take advantage of the outsourcing ecosystem that replaced the overseas factory. However, such gains often come at the cost of poor foreign workers and developing economies. This breeds a cycle in which public resources reinforce inequality instead of promoting equitable development.
Negative Influence of Disrespectful Behavior on The Corporations
In fact, such company practices entail serious risks, such as the following:
Reputation Damage: As transparency increases Owners Of affected firms as well as overseas constituencies react with disbelief at the company smacking away its local responsibility over time.
Legal Repercussions: The European Commission and Member States actively sue companies if the company contravenes the terms of the state aid awarded to it. This can lead to sanctions, recovery of spent funding and restrictions from future financial aiding.
Loss of Confidence: The relations of trust with the local authorities as well as the populations are impaired and thus make these industries more difficult to gain future incentives, which have adverse effects on the long term growth strategies.
Preventing Future Abuses
In order to tackle such issues, there is a need for even greater measures and the enforcement of such measures:
Stronger Performance Clauses: There should be stiff penalties in terms of job creation and commitment to a long-term presence after the government makes out subsidies.
Clawback Clauses – Companies that are unable to fulfill their obligations should be forced to pay back the subsidies that have been bestowed upon them, in other words, to stamp out quick profit making.
Regulating Outsourcing Ecosystems: There is also a need for stricter control on how organizations access public funds with the use of outsourcing networks so that such networks do not facilitate further embedment of inequalities.
https://medium.com/@spsurya13/case-study-nokias-downfall-ed2261b96ded
